tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17220805.post114198257956522426..comments2007-02-16T11:58:53.156+01:00Bragihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12109437004322472888noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17220805.post-1152131830923415512006-07-05T22:37:00.000+02:002006-07-05T22:37:00.000+02:00Wait... maybe I see. I can still use stylesheet_link_tag this way. <BR/><BR/>Good job :)<BR/><BR/>What about changing line 23 of the controller to: <BR/>render(:action => template+".rcss", :type => 'css')<BR/><BR/>so we can name the css files a little more appropriately?Mat Schaffernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17220805.post-1152131178428342042006-07-05T22:26:00.000+02:002006-07-05T22:26:00.000+02:00I took a look at the new RCSS engine. Great stuff. The installation notes should be updated to reflect the engine procedure though. Took me a little while.<BR/><BR/>My standing question now is why do you do:<BR/>template = template.to_s.gsub!(/\.css$/, '')<BR/><BR/>in the controller? I'd rather not munge the .css extension if it doesn't cause a problem. Why not make an RCSS file end in .rcss, right? Does IE perhaps ignore the content-type and cause .rcss files to be treated as text/plain?Mat Schafferhttp://www.matschaffer.comnoreply@blogger.com